The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle: An event-related fMRI analysis

2008 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle: An event-related fMRI analysis​
Melcher, T.; Weidema, M.; Eenshuistra, R. M.; Hommel, B. & Gruber, O.​ (2008) 
NeuroImage39(3) pp. 1274​-1288​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.049 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Melcher, Tobias; Weidema, Maaike; Eenshuistra, Rena M.; Hommel, Bernhard; Gruber, Oliver
Abstract
The present fMRI study sought to investigate the neural basis of perceiving learned action effects and thereby to test for hypotheses based on the ideomotor principle. For this purpose, we had subjects undergo a two-phase experimental procedure comprising an acquisition and a test phase, the latter administered inside the MR scanner. During the acquisition phase, free-choice button presses were contingently followed by one of two tones of different pitch which thereby should become "learned action effects". During the following test phase, subjects were presented with the action effects either when in a passive (non-acting) state or when they carried out forced-choice button presses. Conform to our expectations, we found evidence for a motor effector activation following the passive perception of effect tones which elicited activation in the neural motor system (premotor and somatosensory cortices, SMA, and cerebellum). Surprisingly, however, this activation was observed for left-hand effect tones only, suggesting a basic asymmetry in the impact of ideomotor learning. Moreover, we found activation in the posterior prefrontal and temporo-parietal cortex in response to action effects during the pursuit of goal-directed action. This suggests that action effects attracted special attention and thereby engaged selective cognitive control processes to ensure task-appropriate performance. Finally, there was reduced premotor activation for response-compatible as compared to response-incompatible action effects which can be taken as indication for differential requirements on the motor system and thus for behavioral interference and/or facilitation by learned action effects. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Issue Date
2008
Status
published
Publisher
Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science
Journal
NeuroImage 
ISSN
1053-8119

Reference

Citations


Social Media