Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

2005 | review. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation​
Mielck, F.& Quintel, M.​ (2005)
Current Opinion in Critical Care, 11​(1) pp. 87​-93​.​
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00075198-200502000-00014 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Mielck, F.; Quintel, M.
Abstract
Purpose of review Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has become a more or less accepted standard in the algorithm of advanced acute respiratory distress syndrome therapy in adult patients when all other treatment options have failed. This article reviews the current status of ECMO therapy with particular focus on new technical developments and their potential implications for performance and indications for ECMO therapy. Recent findings A recently published review on a single-center experience in 255 adult ECMO patients identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis age, sex, initial pH 7.10 or lower and PaO2/FiO(2) ratio, and days of mechanical ventilation before ECMO as a significant predictors of survival. Additionally, a careful cost-effectiveness study for neonatal ECMO relating a 4-year base to the UK neonatal ECMO trial has clearly demonstrated cost-effectiveness. Summary Over the years, the technique for ECMO therapy underwent substantial changes in indications and the materials used. Impressive technical progress has been made in pumps, oxygenators, and coating of artificial surfaces, leading to a higher biocompatibility and to a lower rate of procedure-related complications. The potential of new inline pumps in combination with a decreasing rate of procedure-related complications might lead to a re-evaluation of the role of extracorporeal lung support in acute respiratory distress syndrome therapy. A very recent development is the use of spontaneous arteriovenous devices for carbon dioxide removal, allowing significant reduction of ventilator settings at decreased carbon dioxide partial pressures and at increased pH values. Ongoing studies are looking at the potential of this approach to reduce side effects of mechanical ventilation further.
Issue Date
2005
Status
published
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Journal
Current Opinion in Critical Care 
ISSN
1070-5295

Reference

Citations


Social Media