Serological makers of rubella infection in Africa in the pre vaccination era: a systematic review

2015 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Erratum to this publication

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Serological makers of rubella infection in Africa in the pre vaccination era: a systematic review​
Mirambo, M. M.; Majigo, M.; Aboud, S.; Groß, U. & Mshana, S. E.​ (2015) 
BMC Research Notes8(1) art. 716​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1711-x 

Documents & Media

13104_2015_Article_1711.pdf997.37 kBAdobe PDFErratum558.62 kBAdobe PDF

License

Published Version

Attribution 4.0 CC BY 4.0

Details

Authors
Mirambo, Mariam M.; Majigo, Mtebe; Aboud, Said; Groß, Uwe; Mshana, Stephen E.
Abstract
Abstract Background Rubella infections in susceptible women during early pregnancy often results in congenital rubella syndrome (CRS). World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends that countries without vaccination programmes to assess the burden of rubella infection and CRS. However; in many African countries there is limited data on epidemiology of rubella infection and CRS. This review was undertaken to assess the serological markers and genotypes of rubella virus on the African continent in order to ascertain the gap for future research. Findings A systematic search of original literatures from different electronic databases using search terms such as ‘rubella’ plus individual African countries such as ‘Tanzania’, ‘Kenya’, ‘Nigeria’ etc. and different populations such as ‘children’, ‘pregnant women’ etc. in different combinations was performed. Articles from countries with rubella vaccination programmes, outbreak data and case reports were excluded. Data were entered in a Microsoft Excel sheet and analyzed. A total of 44 articles from 17 African countries published between 2002 and 2014 were retrieved; of which 36 were eligible and included in this review. Of all population tested, the natural immunity of rubella was found to range from 52.9 to 97.9 %. In these countries, the prevalence of susceptible pregnant women ranged from 2.1 to 47.1 %. Rubella natural immunity was significantly higher among pregnant women than in general population (P < 0.001). Acute rubella infection was observed to be as low as 0.3 % among pregnant women to 45.1 % among children. All studies did not ascertain the age-specific prevalence, thus it was difficult to calculate the rate of infection with increase in age. Only two articles were found to report on rubella genotypes. Of 15 strains genotyped; three rubella virus genotypes were found to circulate in four African countries. Conclusion Despite variations in serological assays, the seroprevalence of IgG rubella antibodies in Africa is high with a substantial number of women of childbearing age being susceptible to rubella infection. Standardized sero-epidemiological data in various age groups as well as CRS data are important to implement cost-effective vaccination campaigns and control strategies.
Issue Date
2015
Journal
BMC Research Notes 
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media