Comparing strategies for combined testing of rare and common variants in whole sequence and genome-wide genotype data

2016 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Comparing strategies for combined testing of rare and common variants in whole sequence and genome-wide genotype data​
Malzahn, D.; Friedrichs, S. & Bickeböller, H. ​ (2016) 
BMC Proceedings10 art. 17​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12919-016-0042-9 

Documents & Media

12919_2016_Article_42.pdf602.38 kBAdobe PDF

License

Published Version

Attribution 4.0 CC BY 4.0

Details

Authors
Malzahn, Dörthe; Friedrichs, Stefanie; Bickeböller, Heike 
Abstract
Abstract We used our extension of the kernel score test to family data to analyze real and simulated baseline systolic blood pressure in extended pedigrees. We compared the power for different kernels and for different weightings of genetic markers. Moreover, we compared the power of rare and common markers with 3 strategies for joint testing and on marker panels with different densities. Marker weights had much greater influence on power than the kernel chosen. Inverse minor allele frequency weights often increased power on common markers but could decrease power on rare markers. Furthermore, defining the gene region based on linkage disequilibrium blocks often yielded robust power of joint tests of rare and common markers.
Issue Date
2016
Journal
BMC Proceedings 
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media