Fertile women evaluate male bodies as more attractive, regardless of masculinity

2018 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Fertile women evaluate male bodies as more attractive, regardless of masculinity​
Jünger, J. ; Kordsmeyer, T. L. ; Gerlach, T. M.   & Penke, L. ​ (2018) 
Evolution and Human Behavior39(4) pp. 412​-423​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.007 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Jünger, Julia ; Kordsmeyer, Tobias L. ; Gerlach, Tanja M. ; Penke, Lars 
Abstract
Ovulatory cycle shifts in women’s mate preferences have been documented for several physical and behavioral traits. Research suggests that, at peak fertility, women tend to prefer men with characteristics that reflect good genes for short-term sexual relationships. However, existing findings have been criticized for methodological flexibility and failing attempts to replicate core results. In a large (N=157), pre-registered, within-subject study spanning two ovulatory cycles, we investigated cycle shifts in women’s mate preferences for masculine bodies. Using a large set of natural stimuli, we found that when fertile, women’s ratings of male bodies increased for sexual as well as for long-term attractiveness. Both effects were partially mediated by the estradiol-to-progesterone-ratio. Furthermore, moderation analyses revealed that both shifts were only evident in women in relationships, but not in singles. Contrary to previous findings, male masculine traits did not interact with cycle phase to predict attraction, indicating that women’s preferential priorities do not shift. Taken together, our results do not support women’s mate preference shifts, as assumed by the good genes ovulatory shift hypothesis, but are consistent with shifting motivational priorities throughout the cycle. Implications of these results for female estrus theories and methodological recommendations for future research are discussed.
Issue Date
2018
Journal
Evolution and Human Behavior 
Organization
Georg-Elias-Müller Institut für Psychologie ; Leibniz-WissenschaftsCampus Primatenkognition 
ISSN
1090-5138
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media