Estimating seed dispersal distance: a comparison of methods using animal movement and plant genetic data on two primate-dispersed Neotropical plant species: Supplementary Information

2019 | preprint. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Estimating seed dispersal distance: a comparison of methods using animal movement and plant genetic data on two primate-dispersed Neotropical plant species: Supplementary Information​
Gelmi-Candusso, T. A.; Bialozyt, R.; Slana, D.; Zarate-Gomez, R.; Heymann, E. W.  & Heer, K.​ (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/528448 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Gelmi-Candusso, Tiziana A.; Bialozyt, Ronald; Slana, Darja; Zarate-Gomez, Ricardo; Heymann, Eckhard W. ; Heer, Katrin
Abstract
Seed dispersal distances (SDD) critically influence the survival of seedlings, spatial patterns of genetic diversity within plant populations and gene flow among plant populations. In tropical forests, a large percentage of seeds is dispersed by animals, and their foraging behaviour and movement patterns determine SDD. Direct observations of seed dispersal events by animals in natural plant populations are mostly constrained by the high mobility and low visibility of their vectors. Therefore, diverse alternative methods are used to estimate SDD, but direct comparisons of these approaches within the same seed dispersal system are mostly missing. In this study, we take advantage of two plant species with different life history traits, Leonia cymosa and Parkia panurensis that are exclusively dispersed by two tamarin species, Saguinus mystax and Leontocebus nigrifrons (Callitrichidae) at our study site in the Peruvian Amazon. We compare SDD estimates obtained from direct observations, genetic identification of mother plants from seed coats, parentage analysis of seedlings, and modelling approaches, including the combination of movement data and gut passage times and individual-based modelling. We detect differences between SDD estimates that can be linked to the processes relevant at different phases of the seed dispersal loop covered by the respective approaches. Despite these differences, SDD estimates for P. panurensis are consistently lower than for L. cymosa which is likely related to differences in fruit characteristics and fruit abundance, factors that influence gut passage time, foraging behaviour and movement patterns of the tamarins. Our comparisons allow setting SDD estimates from studies using different methodological approaches into the seed dispersal loop context, thus improving comparability of methodologically different studies and method applicability.
Issue Date
2019
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media