Turbulent and Laminar Flow in Karst Conduits Under Unsteady Flow Conditions: Interpretation of Pumping Tests by Discrete Conduit‐Continuum Modeling

2018 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Turbulent and Laminar Flow in Karst Conduits Under Unsteady Flow Conditions: Interpretation of Pumping Tests by Discrete Conduit‐Continuum Modeling​
Giese, M.; Reimann, T. ; Bailly‐Comte, V.; Maréchal, J.; Sauter, M.   & Geyer, T.​ (2018) 
Water Resources Research54(3) pp. 1918​-1933​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020658 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Giese, M.; Reimann, T. ; Bailly‐Comte, V.; Maréchal, J.‐C.; Sauter, M. ; Geyer, T.
Abstract
Abstract Due to the duality in terms of (1) the groundwater flow field and (2) the discharge conditions, flow patterns of karst aquifer systems are complex. Estimated aquifer parameters may differ by several orders of magnitude from local (borehole) to regional (catchment) scale because of the large contrast in hydraulic parameters between matrix and conduit, their heterogeneity and anisotropy. One approach to deal with the scale effect problem in the estimation of hydraulic parameters of karst aquifers is the application of large‐scale experiments such as long‐term high‐abstraction conduit pumping tests, stimulating measurable groundwater drawdown in both, the karst conduit system as well as the fractured matrix. The numerical discrete conduit‐continuum modeling approach MODFLOW‐2005 Conduit Flow Process Mode 1 (CFPM1) is employed to simulate laminar and nonlaminar conduit flow, induced by large‐scale experiments, in combination with Darcian matrix flow. Effects of large‐scale experiments were simulated for idealized settings. Subsequently, diagnostic plots and analyses of different fluxes are applied to interpret differences in the simulated conduit drawdown and general flow patterns. The main focus is set on the question to which extent different conduit flow regimes will affect the drawdown in conduit and matrix depending on the hydraulic properties of the conduit system, i.e., conduit diameter and relative roughness. In this context, CFPM1 is applied to investigate the importance of considering turbulent conditions for the simulation of karst conduit flow. This work quantifies the relative error that results from assuming laminar conduit flow for the interpretation of a synthetic large‐scale pumping test in karst.
Key Points Flow simulation of karst systems with slightly enlarged flow features demands information about conduit flow conditions For mature karst systems laminar conduit flow equations might be applicable even for fully turbulent conditions Conduit roughness should be considered as a lumped parameter reflecting wall roughness as well as geometrical conduit properties
Issue Date
2018
Journal
Water Resources Research 
ISSN
0043-1397
eISSN
1944-7973
ISSN
0043-1397
eISSN
1944-7973
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media