Prospective Clinical and Fiberoptic Evaluation of the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway  ™

2009 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Prospective Clinical and Fiberoptic Evaluation of the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway  ™​
Timmermann, A.; Cremer, S.; Eich, C.; Kazmaier, S.; Bräuer, A.; Graf, B. & Russo, S.​ (2009) 
Anesthesiology110(2) pp. 262​-265​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181942c4d 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Timmermann, Arnd; Cremer, Stefan; Eich, Christoph; Kazmaier, Stephan; Bräuer, Anselm; Graf, Bernhard M.; Russo, Sebastian G.
Abstract
Background In March 2007, a new disposable laryngeal mask airway (LMA) became available. The LMA Supreme (The Laryngeal Mask Company Limited, St. Helier, Jersey, Channel Islands) aims to combine the LMA Fastrach feature of easy insertion with the gastric access and high oropharyngeal leak pressures of the LMA ProSeal. Methods The authors performed an evaluative study with the LMA Supreme, size 4, on 100 women to measure the ease of insertion, determinate the laryngeal fit by fiberoptic classification, evaluate the oropharyngeal leak pressure, and report adverse events. Results Insertion of the LMA Supreme was possible in 94 patients (94%) during the first attempt, and in 5 patients (5%) during the second attempt. In one small patient, the LMA Supreme could not be inserted because of limited pharyngeal space. This patient was excluded from further analysis. Insertion of a gastric tube was possible in all patients at the first attempt. The median time for LMA Supreme insertion was 10.0 s (+/-4.7 s; range, 8-30 s). Laryngeal fit, evaluated by fiberscopic view, was rated as optimal in all patients, both immediately after insertion of the LMA Supreme and at the end of surgery. After equalization to room pressure, the mean cuff volume needed to achieve 60 cm H2O cuff pressure was 18.4 ml (+/-3.8 ml; range, 8-31 ml). The mean oropharyngeal leak pressure at the level of 60 cm H2O cuff pressure was 28.1 cm H2O (+/-3.8 cm H2O, range, 21-35 cm H2O). Eight patients (8.1%) complained of a mild sore throat. No patient reported dysphagia or dysphonia. Conclusions Clinical evaluation of the LMA Supreme showed easy insertion, optimal laryngeal fit, and low airway morbidity. Oropharyngeal leak pressure results were comparable to earlier data from the LMA ProSeal.
Issue Date
2009
Journal
Anesthesiology 
ISSN
0003-3022
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media