Biomechanical Effects of a Cross Connector in Sacral Fractures – A Finite Element Analysis
2021 | journal article; research paper. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.
Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history
Cite this publication
Biomechanical Effects of a Cross Connector in Sacral Fractures – A Finite Element Analysis
Gierig, M.; Liu, F.; Weiser, L.; Lehmann, W.; Wriggers, P.; Marino, M. & Saul, D. (2021)
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.669321
Documents & Media
fbioe-09-669321-g001.tif872.93 kBUnknownfbioe-09-669321-g002.tif580.4 kBUnknownfbioe-09-669321-g003.tif372.18 kBUnknownfbioe-09-669321-g004.tif414.88 kBUnknownfbioe-09-669321-g005.tif317.21 kBUnknownfbioe-09-669321-g006.tif444.5 kBUnknownfbioe-09-669321-g007.tif248.5 kBUnknownfbioe-09-669321-g008.tif168.47 kBUnknownfbioe-09-669321.pdf4.32 MBUnknownImage_1.JPEG2.66 MBUnknownImage_2.JPEG527.79 kBUnknownImage_3.JPEG1.09 MBUnknownImage_4.JPEG1.47 MBUnknownImage_5.JPEG1.71 MBUnknown
Details
- Authors
- Gierig, Meike; Liu, Fangrui; Weiser, Lukas; Lehmann, Wolfgang; Wriggers, Peter; Marino, Michele; Saul, Dominik
- Abstract
- Background: Spinopelvic fractures and approaches of operative stabilization have been a source of controversial discussion. Biomechanical data support the benefit of a spinopelvic stabilization and minimally invasive procedures help to reduce the dissatisfying complication rate. The role of a cross connector within spinopelvic devices remains inconclusive. We aimed to analyze the effect of a cross connector in a finite element model (FE model). Study Design: A FE model of the L1-L5 spine segment with pelvis and a spinopelvic stabilization was reconstructed from patient-specific CT images. The biomechanical relevance of a cross connector in a Denis zone I (AO: 61-B2) sacrum fracture was assessed in the FE model by applying bending and twisting forces with and without a cross connector. Biomechanical outcomes from the numerical model were investigated also considering uncertainties in material properties and levels of osseointegration. Results: The designed FE model showed comparable values in range-of-motion (ROM) and stresses with reference to the literature. The superiority of the spinopelvic stabilization (L5/Os ilium) ± cross connector compared to a non-operative procedure was confirmed in all analyzed loading conditions by reduced ROM and principal stresses in the disk L5/S1, vertebral body L5 and the fracture area. By considering the combination of all loading cases, the presence of a cross connector reduced the maximum stresses in the fracture area of around 10%. This difference has been statistically validated ( p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The implementation of a spinopelvic stabilization (L5/Os ilium) in sacrum fractures sustained the fracture and led to enhanced biomechanical properties compared to a non-reductive procedure. While the additional cross connector did not alter the resulting ROM in L4/L5 or L5/sacrum, the reduction of the maximum stresses in the fracture area was significant.
Background: Spinopelvic fractures and approaches of operative stabilization have been a source of controversial discussion. Biomechanical data support the benefit of a spinopelvic stabilization and minimally invasive procedures help to reduce the dissatisfying complication rate. The role of a cross connector within spinopelvic devices remains inconclusive. We aimed to analyze the effect of a cross connector in a finite element model (FE model). Study Design: A FE model of the L1-L5 spine segment with pelvis and a spinopelvic stabilization was reconstructed from patient-specific CT images. The biomechanical relevance of a cross connector in a Denis zone I (AO: 61-B2) sacrum fracture was assessed in the FE model by applying bending and twisting forces with and without a cross connector. Biomechanical outcomes from the numerical model were investigated also considering uncertainties in material properties and levels of osseointegration. Results: The designed FE model showed comparable values in range-of-motion (ROM) and stresses with reference to the literature. The superiority of the spinopelvic stabilization (L5/Os ilium) ± cross connector compared to a non-operative procedure was confirmed in all analyzed loading conditions by reduced ROM and principal stresses in the disk L5/S1, vertebral body L5 and the fracture area. By considering the combination of all loading cases, the presence of a cross connector reduced the maximum stresses in the fracture area of around 10%. This difference has been statistically validated ( p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The implementation of a spinopelvic stabilization (L5/Os ilium) in sacrum fractures sustained the fracture and led to enhanced biomechanical properties compared to a non-reductive procedure. While the additional cross connector did not alter the resulting ROM in L4/L5 or L5/sacrum, the reduction of the maximum stresses in the fracture area was significant. - Issue Date
- 2021
- Journal
- Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
- Organization
- Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Plastische Chirurgie
- eISSN
- 2296-4185
- Language
- English
- Sponsor
- Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021