Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy in high-risk ICU patients

2021 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy in high-risk ICU patients​
Lüsebrink, E.; Krogmann, A.; Tietz, F.; Riebisch, M.; Okrojek, R.; Peltz, F. & Skurk, C. et al.​ (2021) 
Annals of Intensive Care11(1) art. 116​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00906-5 

Documents & Media

document.pdf961.82 kBAdobe PDF

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors Group
the P. D. T. Investigator Group
The authors list is uncomplete:
Authors
Lüsebrink, Enzo; Krogmann, Alexander; Tietz, Franziska; Riebisch, Matthias; Okrojek, Rainer; Peltz, Friedhelm; Skurk, Carsten; Hullermann, Carsten; Sackarnd, Jan; Wassilowsky, Dietmar; Kellnar, Antonia
Abstract
Abstract Background Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy (PDT) has become an established procedure in intensive care units (ICU). However, the safety of this method has been under debate given the growing number of critically ill patients with high bleeding risk receiving anticoagulation, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or even a combination of both, i.e. triple therapy. Therefore, the purpose of this study, including such a high proportion of patients on antithrombotic therapy, was to investigate whether PDT in high-risk ICU patients is associated with elevated procedural complications and to analyse the risk factors for bleeding occurring during and after PDT. Methods PDT interventions conducted in ICUs at 12 European sites between January 2016 and October 2019 were retrospectively analysed for procedural complications. For subgroup analyses, patient stratification into clinically relevant risk groups based on anticoagulation and antiplatelet treatment regimens was performed and the predictors of bleeding occurrence were analysed. Results In total, 671 patients receiving PDT were included and stratified into four clinically relevant antithrombotic treatment groups: (1) intravenous unfractionated heparin (iUFH, prophylactic dosage) ( n  = 101); (2) iUFH (therapeutic dosage) ( n  = 131); (3) antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and/or P2Y 12 receptor inhibitor) with iUFH (prophylactic or therapeutic dosage) except for triple therapy ( n  = 290) and (4) triple therapy (DAPT with iUFH in therapeutic dosage) ( n  = 149). Within the whole cohort, 74 (11%) bleedings were reported to be procedure-related. Bleeding occurrence during and after PDT was independently associated with low platelet count (OR 0.73, 95% CI [0.56, 0.92], p  = 0.009), chronic kidney disease (OR 1.75, 95% CI [1.01, 3.03], p  = 0.047) and previous stroke (OR 2.13, 95% CI [1.1, 3.97], p  = 0.02). Conclusion In this international, multicenter study bronchoscopy-guided PDT was a safe and low-complication airway management option, even in a cohort of high risk for bleeding on cardiovascular ICUs. Low platelet count, chronic kidney disease and previous stroke were identified as independent risk factors of bleeding during and after PDT but not triple therapy.
Abstract Background Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy (PDT) has become an established procedure in intensive care units (ICU). However, the safety of this method has been under debate given the growing number of critically ill patients with high bleeding risk receiving anticoagulation, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or even a combination of both, i.e. triple therapy. Therefore, the purpose of this study, including such a high proportion of patients on antithrombotic therapy, was to investigate whether PDT in high-risk ICU patients is associated with elevated procedural complications and to analyse the risk factors for bleeding occurring during and after PDT. Methods PDT interventions conducted in ICUs at 12 European sites between January 2016 and October 2019 were retrospectively analysed for procedural complications. For subgroup analyses, patient stratification into clinically relevant risk groups based on anticoagulation and antiplatelet treatment regimens was performed and the predictors of bleeding occurrence were analysed. Results In total, 671 patients receiving PDT were included and stratified into four clinically relevant antithrombotic treatment groups: (1) intravenous unfractionated heparin (iUFH, prophylactic dosage) ( n  = 101); (2) iUFH (therapeutic dosage) ( n  = 131); (3) antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and/or P2Y 12 receptor inhibitor) with iUFH (prophylactic or therapeutic dosage) except for triple therapy ( n  = 290) and (4) triple therapy (DAPT with iUFH in therapeutic dosage) ( n  = 149). Within the whole cohort, 74 (11%) bleedings were reported to be procedure-related. Bleeding occurrence during and after PDT was independently associated with low platelet count (OR 0.73, 95% CI [0.56, 0.92], p  = 0.009), chronic kidney disease (OR 1.75, 95% CI [1.01, 3.03], p  = 0.047) and previous stroke (OR 2.13, 95% CI [1.1, 3.97], p  = 0.02). Conclusion In this international, multicenter study bronchoscopy-guided PDT was a safe and low-complication airway management option, even in a cohort of high risk for bleeding on cardiovascular ICUs. Low platelet count, chronic kidney disease and previous stroke were identified as independent risk factors of bleeding during and after PDT but not triple therapy.
Issue Date
2021
Journal
Annals of Intensive Care 
eISSN
2110-5820
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media