Effects of Two Guideline Implementation Strategies on Patient Outcomes in Primary Care

2008 | journal article; research paper. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Effects of Two Guideline Implementation Strategies on Patient Outcomes in Primary Care​
Becker, A.; Leonhardt, C.; Kochen, M. M.; Keller, S.; Wegscheider, K.; Baum, E. & Donner-Banzhoff, N. et al.​ (2008) 
Spine33(5) pp. 473​-480​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181657e0d 

Documents & Media

Author's Post-print160.12 kBAdobe PDF

License

Author's Version

Special user license Goescholar License

Details

Authors
Becker, Annette; Leonhardt, Corinna; Kochen, Michael M.; Keller, Stefan; Wegscheider, Karl; Baum, Erika; Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert; Pfingsten, Michael; Hildebrandt, Jan; Basler, Heinz-Dieter; Chenot, Jean F.
Abstract
Study design: Cluster randomized controlled trial Objective: To improve quality of care for patients with low back pain (LBP) a multifaceted general practitioner education alone and in combination with motivational counseling by practice nurses has been implemented in German general practices. We studied effects on functional capacity (main outcome), days in pain, physical activity, quality of life or days of sick leave (secondary outcomes) compared to no intervention. Summary of Background data: International research has lead to the development of the German LBP guideline for general practitioners. However, there is still doubt about the most effective implementation strategy. Although effects on process of care have been observed frequently, changes in patient outcomes are rarely seen. Methods: We recruited 1378 patients with LBP in 118 general practices which were randomized to one of three study arms: a multifaceted guideline implementation (GI), GI plus training of practice nurses in motivational counseling (MC) and the postal dissemination of the guideline (controls, C). Data were collected (questionnaires and patient interviews) at baseline and after six and 12 months. Multilevel mixed effects modeling was used to adjust for clustering of data and potential confounders. Results: After 6 months, functional capacity was higher in the intervention groups with a cluster adjusted mean difference of 3.650 between the MC group and controls (95%CI =0.320 – 6.979, p=0.032) and 2.652 between the GI group and controls (95%CI = -0.704 – 6.007, p=0.120). Intervention effects were more pronounced regarding days in pain per year with an average reduction of 16 (GI) to 17 days (MC) after 6 months (12 and 9 days after 12 months) compared to controls. Two guideline implementation strategies / RCT 3 Conclusion: Active implementation of the German LBP guideline results in better outcomes during six months follow-up than its postal dissemination. Training of practice nurses in motivational counseling had no additional benefit.
Issue Date
2008
Journal
Spine 
Organization
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
ISSN
0362-2436
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media