Noninvasive evaluation of pulmonary artery stiffness in heart failure patients via cardiovascular magnetic resonance

2023 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Noninvasive evaluation of pulmonary artery stiffness in heart failure patients via cardiovascular magnetic resonance​
Hou, X.; Hashemi, D.; Erley, J.; Neye, M.; Bucius, P.; Tanacli, R. & Kühne, T. et al.​ (2023) 
Scientific Reports13(1).​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49325-5 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Hou, Xuewen; Hashemi, Djawid; Erley, Jennifer; Neye, Marthe; Bucius, Paulius; Tanacli, Radu; Kühne, Titus; Kelm, Marcus; Motzkus, Laura; Blum, Moritz; Kelle, Sebastian
Abstract
Abstract Heart failure (HF) presents manifestations in both cardiac and vascular abnormalities. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is prevalent in up 50% of HF patients. While pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is closely associated with pulmonary artery (PA) stiffness, the association of HF caused, post-capillary PH and PA stiffness is unknown. We aimed to assess and compare PA stiffness and blood flow hemodynamics noninvasively across HF entities and control subjects without HF using CMR. We analyzed data of a prospectively conducted study with 74 adults, including 55 patients with HF across the spectrum (20 HF with preserved ejection fraction [HFpEF], 18 HF with mildly-reduced ejection fraction [HFmrEF] and 17 HF with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]) as well as 19 control subjects without HF. PA stiffness was defined as reduced vascular compliance, indicated primarily by the relative area change (RAC), altered flow hemodynamics were detected by increased flow velocities, mainly by pulse wave velocity (PWV). Correlations between the variables were explored using correlation and linear regression analysis. PA stiffness was significantly increased in HF patients compared to controls (RAC 30.92 ± 8.47 vs. 50.08 ± 9.08%, p < 0.001). PA blood flow parameters were significantly altered in HF patients (PWV 3.03 ± 0.53 vs. 2.11 ± 0.48, p < 0.001). These results were consistent in all three HF groups (HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF) compared to the control group. Furthermore, PA stiffness was associated with higher NT-proBNP levels and a reduced functional status. PA stiffness can be assessed non-invasively by CMR. PA stiffness is increased in HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF patients when compared to control subjects. Trial registration The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS, registration number: DRKS00015615).
Issue Date
2023
Journal
Scientific Reports 
eISSN
2045-2322
Language
English
Sponsor
Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislaufforschung http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010447
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin 501100002839

Reference

Citations


Social Media