Preoperative Versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 Randomized Phase III Trial After a Median Follow-Up of 11 Years

2012 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Preoperative Versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 Randomized Phase III Trial After a Median Follow-Up of 11 Years​
Sauer, R.; Liersch, T. ; Merkel, S.; Fietkau, R.; Hohenberger, W.; Hess, C. F.   & Becker, H. et al.​ (2012) 
Journal of Clinical Oncology30(16) pp. 1926​-1933​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Sauer, Rolf; Liersch, Torsten ; Merkel, Susanne; Fietkau, Rainer; Hohenberger, Werner; Hess, Clemens Friedrich ; Becker, Heinz; Raab, Hans-Rudolf; Villanueva, Marie-Therese; Witzigmann, Helmut; Wittekind, Christian; Beißbarth, Tim ; Roedel, Claus
Abstract
Purpose Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been established as standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer after first results of the CAO/ARO/AIO-94 [Working Group of Surgical Oncology/Working Group of Radiation Oncology/Working Group of Medical Oncology of the Germany Cancer Society] trial, published in 2004, showed an improved local control rate. However, after a median follow-up of 46 months, no survival benefit could be shown. Here, we report long-term results with a median follow-up of 134 months. Patients and Methods A total of 823 patients with stage II to III rectal cancer were randomly assigned to preoperative CRT with fluorouracil (FU), total mesorectal excision surgery, and adjuvant FU chemotherapy, or the same schedule of CRT used postoperatively. The study was designed to have 80% power to detect a difference of 10% in 5-year overall survival as the primary end point. Secondary end points included the cumulative incidence of local and distant relapses and disease-free survival. Results Of 799 eligible patients, 404 were randomly assigned to preoperative and 395 to postoperative CRT. According to intention-to-treat analysis, overall survival at 10 years was 59.6% in the preoperative arm and 59.9% in the postoperative arm (P = .85). The 10-year cumulative incidence of local relapse was 7.1% and 10.1% in the pre- and postoperative arms, respectively (P = .048). No significant differences were detected for 10-year cumulative incidence of distant metastases (29.8% and 29.6%; P = .9) and disease-free survival. Conclusion There is a persisting significant improvement of pre- versus postoperative CRT on local control; however, there was no effect on overall survival. Integrating more effective systemic treatment into the multimodal therapy has been adopted in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial to possibly reduce distant metastases and improve survival.
Issue Date
2012
Status
published
Publisher
Amer Soc Clinical Oncology
Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology 
ISSN
0732-183X
Sponsor
German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V.) [70-578]; Roche

Reference

Citations


Social Media