Does the Structure of Female Rhesus Macaque Coo Calls Reflect Relatedness and/or Familiarity?

2016 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Does the Structure of Female Rhesus Macaque Coo Calls Reflect Relatedness and/or Familiarity?​
Pfefferle, D. ; Hammerschmidt, K. ; Mundry, R.; Ruiz-Lambides, A. V.; Fischer, J.   & Widdig, A.​ (2016) 
PLOS ONE11(8) art. e0161133​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161133 

Documents & Media

journal.pone.0161133.pdf907.83 kBAdobe PDF

License

Published Version

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Pfefferle, Dana ; Hammerschmidt, Kurt ; Mundry, Roger; Ruiz-Lambides, Angelina V.; Fischer, Julia ; Widdig, Anja
Editors
Reby, David
Abstract
In social animals, kin relations strongly shape the social structure of a group. In female-bonded species, maternal relatedness is likely to be mediated via familiarity, but evidence is accumulating that non-human primates are able to recognize kin that they are not familiar with and adjust their behavior accordingly. In playback experiments, female rhesus macaques showed increased interest in ‘coo’ calls produced by unfamiliar paternal half-sisters compared to ‘coo’ calls produced by unfamiliar unrelated females, suggesting that these calls should have some common structural characteristics that facilitate the discrimination of kin from non-kin. Here we analyzed ‘coo’ calls of 67 adult female rhesus macaques from four groups and seven matrilines living on the island of Cayo Santiago (Puerto Rico). We tested whether the call structure of closely maternal and/or paternal related females, as determined from extensive pedigree data, differed from the call structure of unrelated females, while controlling for familiarity (i.e., group-matrilineal membership and age difference) of subjects. In contrast to our expectation, kinship did not predict similarities in ‘coo’ call structure, whereas ‘coo’ structure was more similar when produced by females of similar age as well as by females with higher familiarity, suggesting that experience is more decisive than genetic background. The high number of individuals in the analysis and the high accuracy of the assignment of calls to individuals render a lack of power as an unlikely explanation. Thus, based on the results of this study, kin recognition in rhesus monkeys does neither appear to be based on the assessment of self-similarity, nor on the comparison among related subjects (i.e., acoustic phenotype matching), but appears to be mediated by different or multiple cues. Furthermore, the results support the notion that frequent social interactions result in increasing acoustic similarity within largely innate call types (‘vocal accommodation’).
Issue Date
2016
Journal
PLOS ONE 
ISSN
1932-6203
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media