Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on regional STEMI care in Germany

2020 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on regional STEMI care in Germany​
Scholz, K. H.; Lengenfelder, B.; Thilo, C.; Jeron, A.; Stefanow, S.; Janssens, U. & Bauersachs, J.  et al.​ (2020) 
Clinical Research in Cardiology109(12) pp. 1511​-1521​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01703-z 

Documents & Media

s00392-020-01703-z.pdf1.71 MBUnknown

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Scholz, Karl Heinrich; Lengenfelder, Björn; Thilo, Christian; Jeron, Andreas; Stefanow, Stefan; Janssens, Uwe; Bauersachs, Johann ; Schulze, P. Christian; Winter, Klaus Dieter; Schröder, Jörg ; vom Dahl, Jürgen; von Beckerath, Nicolas; Seidl, Karlheinz; Friede, Tim ; Meyer, Thomas 
Abstract
Abstract Aims To assess the impact of the lockdown due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on key quality indicators for the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Methods Data were obtained from 41 hospitals participating in the prospective Feedback Intervention and Treatment Times in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FITT-STEMI) study, including 15,800 patients treated for acute STEMI from January 2017 to the end of March 2020. Results There was a 12.6% decrease in the total number of STEMI patients treated at the peak of the pandemic in March 2020 as compared to the mean number treated in the March months of the preceding years. This was accompanied by a significant difference among the modes of admission to hospitals (p = 0.017) with a particular decline in intra-hospital infarctions and transfer patients from other hospitals, while the proportion of patients transported by emergency medical service (EMS) remained stable. In EMS-transported patients, predefined quality indicators, such as percentages of pre-hospital ECGs (both 97%, 95% CI = − 2.2–2.7, p = 0.846), direct transports from the scene to the catheterization laboratory bypassing the emergency department (68% vs. 66%, 95% CI = − 4.9–7.9, p = 0.641), and contact-to-balloon-times of less than or equal to 90 min (58.3% vs. 57.8%, 95%CI = − 6.2–7.2, p = 0.879) were not significantly altered during the COVID-19 crisis, as was in-hospital mortality (9.2% vs. 8.5%, 95% CI = − 3.2–4.5, p = 0.739). Conclusions Clinically important indicators for STEMI management were unaffected at the peak of COVID-19, suggesting that the pre-existing logistic structure in the regional STEMI networks preserved high-quality standards even when challenged by a threatening pandemic. Clinical trial registration NCT00794001
Issue Date
2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Journal
Clinical Research in Cardiology 
ISSN
1861-0684
eISSN
1861-0692
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media